<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Saunders + Silverstein LLP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Damon Dash: Past Due</title>
		<link>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/89</link>
		<comments>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/89#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Silverstein</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[damondash]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rocafella]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks are often always deceiving in the music business. 
&#8220;I&#8217;ve worked with musicians, artists and entertainers that in the eyes of the media are very wealthy,&#8221; said lawyer Jason Gabbard, who represented a fashion firm that settled a suit against Dash and his wife over $148,505 in unpaid fees. &#8220;But to borrow a phrase from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2008/11/14/2008-11-14_damon_dash_from_record__fashion_big_shot.html">Looks are <strike>often</strike> always deceiving in the music business</a>. </p>
<p><i>&#8220;I&#8217;ve worked with musicians, artists and entertainers that in the eyes of the media are very wealthy,&#8221; said lawyer Jason Gabbard, who represented a fashion firm that settled a suit against Dash and his wife over $148,505 in unpaid fees. &#8220;But to borrow a phrase from my Kentucky homeland, they haven&#8217;t got a pot to p&#8212; in - they&#8217;re broke.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>The article refers to Dash&#8217;s &#8220;MC Hammer-like financial abyss[.]&#8221; Ouch!</p>
<p>Do you really think most musicians own the homes you see on Cribs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/89/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Nelson Mandela?</title>
		<link>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/88</link>
		<comments>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/88#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Silverstein</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nelsonmandela]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rightofpublicity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NameWire on use of the Mandela name for branding purposes.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NameWire on use of the <a href="http://www.namedevelopment.com/blog/archives/2008/09/who_has_the_rig.html">Mandela name for branding purposes</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/88/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademarks in Virtual Worlds</title>
		<link>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/87</link>
		<comments>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/87#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Silverstein</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[intellectualproperty]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[secondlife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much has already been written about &#8220;in-game&#8221; use of trademarks.
This article, part 1 of 3, is a good primer on the subject.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has already been written about &#8220;in-game&#8221; use of trademarks.<br />
<a href="http://www.technewsworld.com/story/must-read/65119.html?wlc=1226494763">This article, part 1 of 3, is a good primer on the subject</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/87/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft and the AZURE trademark</title>
		<link>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/86</link>
		<comments>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/86#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Silverstein</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the New York Times: &#8220;Searches on the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office database run throughout Monday failed to find either &#8220;Windows Azure&#8221; or &#8220;Azure Services Platform&#8221; as registered trademarks. Microsoft used both names to describe its Software and Services technology.&#8221;
I&#8217;m not even sure where to start with this article. Instead of dissecting the entire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the New York Times: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/external/idg/2008/10/28/28idg-Microsoft-We-d.html">&#8220;Searches on the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office database run throughout Monday failed to find either &#8220;Windows Azure&#8221; or &#8220;Azure Services Platform&#8221; as registered trademarks. Microsoft used both names to describe its Software and Services technology.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not even sure where to start with this article. Instead of dissecting the entire piece, all I will say for now is that Microsoft has successfully used Paris Convention priority many times. Its strategy in some cases has been to file trademark applications in countries which do not have an easily accessible trademark databases, such as Germany. Microsoft will then go about registering domain names and also filing trademark applications in other countries within 6-months of the original filing, thereby claiming a priority date of the original filing. It allows the company to operate in stealth mode while at the same time securing priority.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Sure enough, at least <a href="http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;entry=77600080">one US application is based on a foreign filing in South Africa</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/86/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black Friday cease and desist roundup</title>
		<link>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/85</link>
		<comments>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/85#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 13:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blackfriday]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ceaseanddesist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BFads.net, my destination of choice for scoping out upcoming Black Friday (and this year, pre-BF) sales, gives a roundup of the various cease-and-desist letters it&#8217;s received from retailers so far this year. Of note is the communication from Sears, which prohibits BFads from displaying scans of the ad itself, but allows them to provide a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bfads.net" target="_blank">BFads.net</a>, my destination of choice for scoping out upcoming Black Friday (and this year, pre-BF) sales, gives a <a href="http://bfads.net/Cease-Desist-Tally-SoFar-5" target="_blank">roundup of the various cease-and-desist letters</a> it&#8217;s received from retailers so far this year. Of note is the communication from Sears, which prohibits BFads from displaying scans of the ad itself, but allows them to provide a text list of the sale items. Well played.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/85/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Registrant Loses porsche.me UDRP proceeding</title>
		<link>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/84</link>
		<comments>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/84#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Silverstein</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[domainnames]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[udrp]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[whatthehellweretheythinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[File under &#8220;What the hell were they thinking.&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/06/porscheme-money-down-the-drain/">File under &#8220;What the hell were they thinking.&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/84/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LaLa&#8217;s nono: using photos without authorization?</title>
		<link>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/83</link>
		<comments>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/83#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lala]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LaLa, the music site that generated some buzz on its launch for its unique listening and pricing structure, might be in for some press they don&#8217;t really want. It seems they&#8217;re making a habit of jazzing up their band pages with photos from Flickr, without bothering to get permission from the photographers first. After Flickr [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lala.com" target="_blank">LaLa</a>, the music site that generated some buzz on its launch for its unique listening and pricing structure, might be in for some press they don&#8217;t really want. It seems they&#8217;re making a habit of jazzing up their band pages with photos from Flickr, without bothering to get permission from the photographers first. After <a href="http://flickr.com/groups/concertshots/discuss/72157608477732254/" target="_blank">Flickr users got wind of this and raised the alarm</a>, it appears LaLa added a line above each photo crediting Flickr as the &#8220;source&#8221;, and a link reading &#8220;Report image&#8221; that, when clicked, fires up an email to their support team.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unclear if LaLa has some sort of relationship with Flickr that they believe permits this activity even without some express opt-in by Flickr users. Barring such an arrangement, I expect LaLa is going to be spending a bit of time dealing with a flood of DMCA notifications.</p>
<p>Update: it appears LaLa got the message, and has pulled all of the suspect photos from the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/83/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diamond Dogs: Harry Winston Loses Domain Dispute Over Hairywinston.com</title>
		<link>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/82</link>
		<comments>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/82#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Silverstein</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Respondent accepts that the Domain Name is similar to the Complainants’ well-known trade mark, but denies that it is confusingly similar to that trade mark. She contends that it will be obvious to all that her use of the name, Hairy Winston, is a playful variation of the Complainants’ famous trade mark. One of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Respondent accepts that the Domain Name is similar to the Complainants’ well-known trade mark, but denies that it is confusingly similar to that trade mark. She contends that it will be obvious to all that her use of the name, Hairy Winston, is a playful variation of the Complainants’ famous trade mark. One of her dogs, a hairy dog, is named Winston. She selected the name, Hairy Winston, for her ‘luxury pet boutique’ business to make playful use of the name of the dog and the Complainants’ trade mark. She acknowledges and intends that the name will bring the name of the Complainants to mind, but not in a context likely to lead to any confusion. As she puts it, “thus, the name playfully suggests to the customer both high-quality goods and an incongruous association with the hairy canine world.”</i></p>
<p><i>The Panel is satisfied that the Respondent’s intention in registering and using the Domain Name as she has was to parody the Complainants’ famous name and trade mark and that she was justified in believing that the parody would successfully differentiate the parody from the original such as to obviate any significant risk of confusion or deception. In such circumstances it would be perverse to categorise the Respondent’s intentions when she registered the Domain Name as bad faith intentions for the purposes of the Policy. The Policy is intended to address clear cases of cybersquatting, and whatever else the present case may be, it is not that.</i></p>
<p>The decision can be viewed <a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2008/d2008-1267.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/82/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glam Guns</title>
		<link>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/81</link>
		<comments>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/81#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Silverstein</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glam Guns (via TrendLand)
The footer to the site reads:
NOTE: This site is a parody for humor purposes only. No actual weapons may be bought on this site. &#8220;Hello Kitty&#8221; is a trademark of Sanrio, Inc. You&#8217;re taking the wrong drugs if you think that Sanrio would ever license the use of Hello Kitty for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.glamguns.com/storemain.html">Glam Guns</a> (via <a href="http://cyanatrendland.com">TrendLand</a>)</p>
<p>The footer to the site reads:<br />
<i>NOTE: This site is a parody for humor purposes only. No actual weapons may be bought on this site. &#8220;Hello Kitty&#8221; is a trademark of Sanrio, Inc. You&#8217;re taking the wrong drugs if you think that Sanrio would ever license the use of Hello Kitty for a firearm or weapon of any sort. &#8220;Disney Princess&#8221; is a trademark of the Walt Disney Company. &#8220;CareBear&#8221; and &#8220;Rainbow Brite&#8221; are trademarks of American Greetings Corporation and/or Hallmark. There is no such thing as &#8220;Sucking-Chest-Wound Bear.&#8221; &#8220;My Little Pony&#8221; and &#8220;Easy-Bake Oven&#8221; are trademarks of Hasbro. &#8220;Dora the Explorer&#8221; is owned by Nickelodeon UK. &#8220;Martha Stewart Colors&#8221; is a trademark of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. GlamGuns.com has no connection with and is not affiliated with Sanrio, Inc, Hasbro, Walt Disney Company, Hallmark, American Greetings Corporation, Nickelodeon, Nickelodeon UK, Nick Jr., Martha Stewart, Omnimedia, Inc, Paris Hilton, Mother Theresa, Lady Diana, or, in fact, much of anyone really, especially Dick Cheney who, at no time, was CEO of our corporation or even on the Board of Directors. No, really. Would we lie to you?<i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/81/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIP Zima, 1992-2008</title>
		<link>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/80</link>
		<comments>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/80#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Malternative? Alcopop? Whatever Zima was, it is no longer. The carbonated alcoholic beverage has been discontinued by MillerCoors. Launched with great fanfare as &#8220;zomething different&#8221;, Zima was subject to ongoing ridicule, and died a long, slow death. I expect promoting it as what to drink when there isn&#8217;t any beer might have been the beginning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malternative? Alcopop? Whatever Zima was, it is no longer. The carbonated alcoholic beverage has been <a href="http://www.brandweek.com/bw/content_display/news-and-features/packaged-goods/e3i10333d62a57e715f470809cebd7094af" target="_blank">discontinued by MillerCoors</a>. Launched with great fanfare as &#8220;zomething different&#8221;, Zima was subject to ongoing ridicule, and died a long, slow death. I expect promoting it as <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDzo1xKJhF0">what to drink when there isn&#8217;t any beer</a> might have been the beginning of the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://massiplaw.com/massiplaw/archives/80/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
